Washington D.C — A new article from Stateline highlights how Medicaid enrollees from five states who have filed a lawsuit against new Medicaid cuts. The Republican Tax law has led to new, extreme restrictions for those who may have previously qualified for Medicaid coverage. This especially impacts those with severe illnesses and disabilities who could be forced to prove their illness to the government in order to access basic health coverage. The plaintiffs in this suit come from Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, and North Carolina.
Advocates warn that these cuts threaten coverage for those who seriously need it. People with different types of health conditions are represented in this lawsuit, highlighting how these new restrictions from the Republican Tax Law will impact people with a range of different health conditions. Medical groups are concerned with how these cuts will interrupt coverage for low-income and vulnerable groups.
Stateline: Medical groups, patients sue Trump administration over Medicaid work requirements
Key Points:
- Medicaid enrollees from five states and leading medical organizations filed a lawsuit Friday challenging new Medicaid work requirements.
- The broad tax and spending law that President Donald Trump signed last summer, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, established work, school or community service requirements for low-income adults who receive Medicaid under expansion provisions and waiver programs across 44 states.
- Plaintiffs in the lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland include Medicaid enrollees from five states — Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri and North Carolina.
- They also include the American College of Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine, Doctors for America, the New Hampshire Medical Society, the New Hampshire Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the city of Columbus. The National Health Law Program and the Democracy Forward Foundation are representing the plaintiffs.
- Republicans argue that work requirements would push people into the workforce and allow them to come off government aid. Research shows the majority of Medicaid recipients already work or are in school.
- The plaintiffs argue that the new designations are narrow and that work or exemption verification processes will create red tape that threatens Medicaid coverage for people with serious or chronic health conditions.
- Work requirements will be costly for cities and localities that provide public health and emergency care services, the plaintiffs argue, as many people may lose coverage.
- Medical groups are concerned the reporting burdens will cause interruptions in care and coverage for low-income, vulnerable adults.
- “We should not and must not be implementing policies that place this already vulnerable population at increased risk of interrupted treatment, disrupted coverage, or losing healthcare access altogether,” said Dr. Jan K. Carney, president of the American College of Physicians.
To learn more about the campaign, visit UnrigOurEconomy.com or contact press@unrigoureconomy.com
###
About Unrig Our Economy
Unrig Our Economy is a national campaign to fix the rules of our economy to make it work for working people. We know that when the middle class does well, all of us do well — which is why we’re fighting on behalf of working Americans and holding corporations, their wealthy executives, and the politicians who enable them accountable.